Management in Action  >>  Managing People

Best Practices in HR
What is the role of human resources as the world goes through turmoil and, what is its future as so many industries face extreme change?

Effendi Ibnoe Bali, Indonesia

Talk about timing. Your question arrived in our in-box the same day that we received a note from an acquaintance who had just been let go from his job in publishing, certainly one of the industries that is facing, as you put it, “extreme change.” He described his layoff as a practically Orwellian experience in which he was ushered into a conference room to meet with an outplacement consultant who, after dispensing with logistics, informed him that she would call him at home that evening to make sure everything was all right.

“I assured her I had friends and loved ones and a dog,” he wrote, “and since my relationship with her could be measured in terms of seconds, they could take care of that end of things.”

“Memo to HR: Instead of saddling dismissed employees with solicitous outplacement reps,” he noted wryly, “put them in a room with some crockery for a few therapeutic minutes of smashing things against a wall.”

While we enjoy our friend’s sense of humor, we’d suggest a different memo to HR. “Layoffs are your moment of truth,” it would say, “when your company must show departing employees the same kind of attentiveness and dignity that was showered upon them when they entered. Layoffs are when HR proves its mettle and its worth, demonstrating whether a company really cares about its people.”

Look, we’ve written before about HR and the game-changing role we believe it can—and should—play as the engine of an organization’s hiring, appraisal, and development processes. We’ve asserted that too many companies relegate HR to the mundane busy-work of newsletters, picnics, and benefits, and we’ve made the case that every CEO should elevate his head of HR to the same stature as the CFO.

But if there was ever a time to underscore the importance of HR, it has arrived. And, sadly, if there was ever a time to see how few companies get HR right, it has arrived, too, as our acquaintance’s experience shows.

So, to your question: What is HR’s correct role now—especially in terms of layoffs?

First, HR has to make sure people are let go by their managers, not strangers. Being fired is dehumanizing in any event, but to get the news from a “hired gun” only makes matters worse. That’s why HR must ensure that managers accept their duty, which is to be in on the one conversation at work that must be personal. Pink slips should be delivered face-to-face, eyeball-to-eyeball.

Second, HR’s role is to serve as the company’s arbiter of equity. Nothing raises hackles more during a layoff than the sense that some people—namely the loudmouths and the litigious—are getting better deals than others. HR can mitigate that dynamic by making sure across units and divisions that severance arrangements, if they exist, are appropriate and evenhanded. You simply don’t want people to leave feeling as if they got you-know-what. They need to walk out saying: “At least I know I was treated fairly.”

Finally, HR’s role is to absorb pain. In the hours and days after being let go, people need to vent, and it is HR’s job to be completely available to console. At some point, an outplacement consultant can come into the mix to assist with a transition, but HR can never let “the departed” feel as if they’ve been sent to a leper colony. Someone connected to each let-go employee—either a colleague or HR staffer—should check in regularly. And not just to ask, “Is everything O.K.?” but to listen to the answer with an open heart, and when appropriate, offer to serve as a reference to prospective employers.

Three years ago, we wrote a column called, “So Many CEOs Get This Wrong,” and while many letters supported our stance that too many companies undervalue HR, a significant minority pooh-poohed HR as irrelevant to the “real work” of business. Given the state of things, we wonder how those same HR-minimalists feel now.

If their company is in crisis – or their own career – perhaps at last they’ve seen the light. HR matters enormously in good times.

It defines you in the bad.


This question and answer originally appeared in Business Week magazine on March 12, 2009.

Usha V Sagar
3/13/2009 5:01 AM

The Statement that HR matters enormously in good times and it defines in the Bad Times is absolutely right. It is always better the manager speaks with the persons whom we have to let go. If we have been there to share good moments, it is true in sad moments too. I have the personal experience of doing the bad job and the good job. I had made sure that when ever there is an opening, the one who are removed are absorbed in the first instance. It makes a better business as an experienced employee layed off due to less production requirement need not be trained further when called back. They are also motivators for others around. When the only thing that is constant is change, we should always be ready and communicate that the change is inevitable.

 
Marie Springsteen, HR
3/14/2009 1:04 PM

Dear Jack and Suzy: I am an HR professional who has been on both sides of the fence in reduction in forces. My personal experience years ago in being layed off allowed me to have the empathy necessary when I found myself the one delivering the message to others. Since 2004 I have had multiple experiences within different industries of being involved directly involved in employee layoffs. The emotions that are revealed during these events range from anger, saddness, and relief. I agree with your statement that the individual managers should be the ones delivering the message. It does reflect caring and compassion. These decisions are not entered into lightly and those manager's whom I have worked with struggled with their own emotions before, during and after the layoffs. Those layoffs where the news was delivered by someone other than a manager, owner or president of the company have resulted in have employees showing extreme anger, calling after the event screaming and crying, begging for the job back. As professionals we need to be there for them, to listen and help if we can. I have also seen, where the message being delivered by the top executives directly to the employees, face to face, resulting in employees who feel they were appreciated, who understood that the decision was not personal but a business decision and those employees were actually grateful to be given the chance to speak directly with the top executives. It was during one of these mass layoffs that I actually received hugs, kisses and expressions of gratitude for being there with them to answer their questions and help find other employment when I could. It is truly our time to shine. We are a reflection of the companies we work for and those that acknowledge our profession are leaders to the future. The current economic conditions make not change for the near future and many more layoffs will happen and HR professionals are ready to handle the challenge.

 
Wally Bock
3/16/2009 5:07 PM

This is great advice, but not just for HR. Decisions in hard times reveal character, priorities, and values. They have powerful emotional impacts and that means that they will be relived in memory and retold in story long after this downturn has come and gone.

 
irene namubimba
3/17/2009 9:27 AM

what is the relationship between human resource management and integrity

 
Alan Braverman
3/23/2009 1:13 PM

Your current column on HR and layoffs reminds me of what I say to whoever will listen about the other R: PR. Public relations is about building up and maintaining a reputation in times of peace because when the crisis comes – not IF, when – you need every iota of goodwill to be able to make your case. Your July 17, 2006 column on CEOs getting HR wrong could just as easily be talking about PR. It is shocking how many otherwise talented and smart executive assume that a PR firm will “spin it” and make all the trouble go away. I always answer, “Public relations is about what you do and not about what you say.” If your company hasn't been making its PR investments, how could it possibly reap the benefits of any dividend?

 
parag agarwal
3/28/2009 6:46 AM

Would like to comment on a related topic: even before a company gets to the stage of laying off employees, there should be first significant salary cuts taken by the senior management, followed by more modest cuts across other levels. If a company has been weeding out employees who are not performing on a regular basis, why should there be any layoffs when a downturn hits. To be fair to the employees as a group, salary cuts should be the first resort before layoffs are considered.

 
RPL
12/26/2009 8:48 AM

What's the role of HR I hear you ask? Well it better start doing what it is supposed to do. get into its Transformational. Leadership Role. Start working the talent process and the intangibles. and stop doing the transactional stuff. Start understanding the business external and internal dynamics and what's add value to the stakeholders... and then forming the strategies and processes that deliver against the metrics. Start doing the role that it continues to fall short on..that which makes a business difference and oh by the way that leads to success for all Then and only then can we really say we have done our best for those being laid off. For those who are, yes have an exit strategy that you can be proud of, lets treat the talent with respect all the way

 
Asamo Segun
2/1/2010 10:36 AM

the issue of layoffs are quite challenging and difficulty to handle, especially when the reason is based on cost cutting due to global economic cruch. However, i agreed with parag agarwa on salary cut, but all other unnecessary spending should be terminated especially the MD/CEO, GM and other top officials.

 
 
     
Back to top